Individual data of Q3 2011 may pass and no errors - 21 September 2011

Main » » Individual data of Q3 2011 may pass and no errors

16:00 Individual data of Q3 2011 may pass and no errors
On the issue of delivery of individual data of Q3 2011, we continue to inform the important nuances that you need to know every accountant. Today we will speak about mistakes that delay the delivery of these data to the Pension Fund. When you send personal information, Q3 2011 is quite possible that the Fund will not accept the report because of the endless mistakes. Office of the RPF in this situation can you fix an inaccuracy after another, which makes the reporting period, the constant hassle. Well, if the accountant to provide individual information will be used system-circuit externally. And if he will personally visit the office, stand in long lines and spending lots of time. So here we are publishing the most common mistakes on the subtleties of the submission of this information. Type of information to personally identifiable information (Q3 2011) The organization receives a negative report. Then the accountant can quite possibly make a mistake. The company re-surrender form BCR-6-1 and BCR-6-2 and indicate the type of information - "correction" which is incorrect. Recall that the mark should be set only when the form of individual data of Q3 2011 Office will be accepted, and revealed their own accountant error in the original form. And in our case, when the original form of documents were returned with errors, you must specify the type of information - "original." If this is ignored, the forms simply will not pass. When you send personal information, Q3 2011 and not all employees After receiving a negative protocol of the Pension Fund, it is possible, the accountant will send a new form of personal information only to those employees which have been identified shortcomings. This is a gross mistake, and the forms in the fund also will not pass. In this case, you must re-submit all reporting, including in the form of individual data of Q3 of all employees, which should also be added, and those workers for which there were no errors. In the personally identifiable information are only differences in the amounts of contributions In case of discrepancies in the individual information for the 3rd quarter 2011 checksums, the Pension Fund may also issue a negative report. For example, it is possible in the case where the amount of these premiums above those that have been assessed. By submitting a revised personal data of Q3, the organization likely will not show all of the contributions, but only the difference in performance. And this, in terms of the Pension Fund is not true, so the result of such deposit will again negative report. In this case, the original forms must be filled in completely all the data. More precisely specify the amount of all of these premiums, rather than the difference between the original and repeated information. Recall that only the corrected information in the form of an inventory of ADV-6-2 should be placed on the amounts of difference.
1 2 3 4 5 Views: 350 \| Added by: AleksandroVSD \| Rating: 0.0/0